Zum Inhalt springen
Supastack
DE
Design
AnmeldenSupastack holen

Menü

AnmeldenSupastack holen
Original Research & Datasets

SaaS Engineering & Market Research

Empirical benchmarks and technical studies on SaaS infrastructure build times, payment processor schedules, and starter kit architectures. Every number is calculated from verifiable, tested datasets.

Financial Benchmark
62.5% MoR
Market Share

SaaS Payment Provider Fees & Merchant of Record Benchmark 2026: 8 Providers Analyzed

In an analysis of 8 major SaaS billing providers in 2026, 5 of 8 (62.5%) operate as Merchant of Record with an average fee of 4.58% + $0.46, compared to 3.03% + $0.36 for direct processors.

Key Findings:
  • Merchant of Record Market Share: 5 of 8 analyzed SaaS billing providers (62.5%) operate as Merchant of Record (handling global sales tax and VAT liability on behalf of the seller), while 3 (37.5%) are direct payment processors.
  • Merchant of Record Fee Premium: Merchant of Record platforms charge an average base transaction fee of 4.58% + $0.46, representing an average 1.55 percentage-point premium over direct payment processors (average 3.03% + $0.36) in exchange for automated tax registration and remittance.
Read full report .md
Engineering Benchmark
385h DIY
Average Build Time

SaaS Infrastructure Development Hours & Engineering Cost Benchmark 2026: 12 Core Modules Analyzed

In an engineering analysis of 12 SaaS infrastructure modules in 2026, building from scratch requires 385 hours (9.6 weeks full-time), with billing (60h) and workspaces (45h) accounting for 27.3% of total build time.

Key Findings:
  • DIY SaaS Infrastructure Build Hours: Building a production-ready Web SaaS foundation from scratch requires an average of 385 solo engineering hours (equivalent to 9.6 weeks of full-time development at 40 hours/week) across 12 core infrastructure modules.
  • Primary Engineering Time Sinks: Billing and subscription management (60 hours, 15.6% of total) and multi-tenant workspace architecture (45 hours, 11.7%) are the two largest single engineering time sinks in DIY SaaS development.
Read full report .md
Market Study
13.3% Mobile
Cross-Platform Scarcity

Next.js SaaS Boilerplates & Starter Kits Market Study 2026: 15 Solutions Compared

In an audited technical study of 15 leading SaaS boilerplates in 2026, only 2 (13.3%) include mobile support and 1 (6.7%) support desktop, while 6 (40%) have adopted Drizzle ORM and 11 (73.3%) utilize lifetime pricing.

Key Findings:
  • Mobile App Availability: Only 2 of 15 leading SaaS boilerplates (13.3%) include an integrated mobile app (Expo React Native with shared auth and business logic), while 13 (86.7%) are strictly web-only.
  • Desktop Application Support: Only 1 of 15 boilerplates (6.7%, supastack) includes a cross-platform desktop shell (Tauri for macOS and Windows) unified in the same monorepo.
Read full report .md

The Single-Calculation Guarantee

All statistics on this site originate from tested, deterministic calculation functions tested against real codebases and published fee schedules. We never estimate, round up, or hardcode numbers. When our datasets update, every finding, page, markdown twin, and FAQ answer updates simultaneously.